Rich80105<rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:55:54 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Wednesday, 14 September 2016 17:51:52 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 22:02:16 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Wednesday, 14 September 2016 16:37:18 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:

On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:35:17 +1200, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote: >>> >>

Liebor have been using the same emailing system as every-one else in >>> >> >Parliament for something like (we'll be kind) seven years and up to now >>> >> >have never known how filters work....
REALLY ????????
And one twit doesn't know that you can edit .PDF files...

The Speaker is being treated as an idiot by Liebor but tries to explain >>> >> >their deliberate ignorance of a system they've been using for at least >>> >> >7
years...
So rich isn't the only thickwit they have

What are you on about, george? Do you have a cite?

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/84212899/Parliamentary-Service-blocked-email-between-MP-and-Fairfax-journalist

QUOTE
Hipkins says this is a "clear breach of parliamentary privilege".

"That's outrageous, they have no right to be screening the emails being >>> >sent by Members of Parliament. It shouldn't matter where I got the information
from, they've got no right to monitor my emails in the first place."

"I know that National is now cosying up to (Fiji Prime Minister) Frank
Bainimarama, but that doesn't mean they can adopt his dictatorial,
anti-democratic methods here in New Zealand," he said.
UNQUOTE

So where is the twit that doesn't know about editing pdf files?

Do you have a cite, or were you interviewing your imaginaton?

Do Parliamentary Services have a right to monitor emails?
Do you think they should?

No answer to that one either?

If an email is stopped because its content triggers a search, who
looks at it?

No answer to that one . . . getting to be a pattern . . .

Stupid Chippie blaming National for something operated by Parliamentary >>> >Services and setup under Clark's government.

How do you know it hasn't changed?

Asking to prove a negative Dickbot? Idiot.

No, but you are implying that it has not changed - do you have proof
of that assertion?

Apparently when Labour were in
government emails were not being stopped by their content being
searched. A lot of changes have been made to security matters over the
last 8 years - and National have been very keen to find out who leaks
material that embarrasses them . . .

The Speaker has said he will investigate - so he doesn't think its a
stupid question to be asked.

He's not investigating anything. He has simply asked Parliamentary Services >>to explain it to him.

So is he the idiot that doesn;t know about pdfs? Why would he need
something explained that you claim doesn't need explanation?

I saw this article

http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/313230/speaker-to-investigate-whether-mps'-emails-are-monitored
but it doesn't have the weird stuff you are talking about.

It seems quite simple. If an MP sends or receives an email it should >>> >> (and probably does) go through some system that checks that it does ot >>> >> contain a virus or other malware.

Hipkins has been told his email was stopped because of security
classifications - which implies that the content is being
elctronically searched to see if it contans certain words.

Hipkins has asked the Speaker to investigate.
Seems fair to me - what is the problem with that?

In the meantime, I suggest that any whistleblower not send material to >>> >> any opposition MP through email!

Did you even read what I had said, JohnO? Would you be happy with a
system that allowed emails to anmd from MPs to be read by a government
department?

It's an automated secure email system (Seemail) you fuckwit. There isn't some >>government censor reading them and deciding what to block.

Can you guarantee that no-one looks at an email that is rejected due
to "security concerns'?

There is still the issue that in this case we are told that the email
was not passed on - that has to be a concern to MPs that a system is >restricting their access to contacts. Would you be happy with such a
system if National were in opposition?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)