http://www.roymorgan.com/findings/6902-roy-morgan-new-zealand-voting-intention-july-2016-201607211639
On 7/21/2016 8:23 PM, Liberty wrote:
http://www.roymorgan.com/findings/6902-roy-morgan-new-zealand-voting-intention-july-2016-201607211639
Well they only have themselves to blame.
The constant harping on about the homeless is a big put off.
And the 'housing shortage' is not the governments concern when the
councils refuse to allow land and building permits
On 22/07/2016 8:51 AM, george152 wrote:
On 7/21/2016 8:23 PM, Liberty wrote:
http://www.roymorgan.com/findings/6902-roy-morgan-new-zealand-voting-intention-july-2016-201607211639
Well they only have themselves to blame.
The constant harping on about the homeless is a big put off.
And the 'housing shortage' is not the governments concern when the
councils refuse to allow land and building permits
Labour-Green will make no progress at all with Little at the helm.
They've had it if they go to the election with him as leader. Key will annihilate him in any debate. Problem is they don't have anyone to step
in as king-pin..
On 7/21/2016 8:23 PM, Liberty wrote:
http://www.roymorgan.com/findings/6902-roy-morgan-new-zealand-voting-intention-july-2016-201607211639
Well they only have themselves to blame.
The constant harping on about the homeless is a big put off.
And the 'housing shortage' is not the governments concern when the
councils refuse to allow land and building permits
On 7/22/2016 11:07 AM, Newsman wrote:
Bernard Hickey..
Now , there's your problem, using a bias as a source
On 7/22/2016 9:15 AM, Fred wrote:
On 22/07/2016 8:51 AM, george152 wrote:
On 7/21/2016 8:23 PM, Liberty wrote:
http://www.roymorgan.com/findings/6902-roy-morgan-new-zealand-voting-intention-july-2016-201607211639
Well they only have themselves to blame.
The constant harping on about the homeless is a big put off.
And the 'housing shortage' is not the governments concern when the
councils refuse to allow land and building permits
Labour-Green will make no progress at all with Little at the helm.
They've had it if they go to the election with him as leader. Key will
annihilate him in any debate. Problem is they don't have anyone to step
in as king-pin..
Were I associated with Liebor, the greens or winston first I would be
going back to the drawing board and rethinking whatever plan it is they
think they have.
We're sick of the preachy shit, the dirty tricks, biased media and the >perpetual Key did it nonsense.
Otherwise they're dog tucker (again)
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 10:22:54 +1200, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:
On 7/22/2016 9:15 AM, Fred wrote:
On 22/07/2016 8:51 AM, george152 wrote:
On 7/21/2016 8:23 PM, Liberty wrote:
http://www.roymorgan.com/findings/6902-roy-morgan-new-zealand-voting-intention-july-2016-201607211639
Well they only have themselves to blame.
The constant harping on about the homeless is a big put off.
And the 'housing shortage' is not the governments concern when the
councils refuse to allow land and building permits
Labour-Green will make no progress at all with Little at the helm.
They've had it if they go to the election with him as leader. Key will
annihilate him in any debate. Problem is they don't have anyone to step
in as king-pin..
Were I associated with Liebor, the greens or winston first I would be
going back to the drawing board and rethinking whatever plan it is they
think they have.
We're sick of the preachy shit, the dirty tricks, biased media and the
perpetual Key did it nonsense.
Otherwise they're dog tucker (again)
Actually Labour is dog-tucker alone. They have simply been unable to
work out how to recapture the popular support they had while Clark was Parliamentary leader. Winston First and the Greens are both List-only parties and each struggle to get a double-digit party vote percentage.
Support for Labour, in both electorate and party vote, is at record
lows and they simply don't seem to know how to get it back.
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:43:09 +1200, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:
On 7/22/2016 11:07 AM, Newsman wrote:
Bernard Hickey..
Now , there's your problem, using a bias as a source
So who do yuo rely on, george?
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/mediawatch/audio/201807260/is-a-'post-truth'-era-upon-us
On Friday, 22 July 2016 21:30:54 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:43:09 +1200, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:
On 7/22/2016 11:07 AM, Newsman wrote:
Bernard Hickey..
Now , there's your problem, using a bias as a source
So who do yuo rely on, george?
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/mediawatch/audio/201807260/is-a-'post-truth'-era-upon-us
Nobody in their right mind would rely on "Red Radio".
On 7/25/2016 10:35 AM, JohnO wrote:
On Friday, 22 July 2016 21:30:54 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:43:09 +1200, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:
On 7/22/2016 11:07 AM, Newsman wrote:
Bernard Hickey..
Now , there's your problem, using a bias as a source
So who do yuo rely on, george?
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/mediawatch/audio/201807260/is-a-'post-truth'-era-upon-us
Nobody in their right mind would rely on "Red Radio".
But rich believes.
By the bye I wouldn't take the word of any of the current commentators
who forget that their job is to report the news not create or be a part
of it.
On Monday, 25 July 2016 13:15:28 UTC+12, george wrote:
On 7/25/2016 10:35 AM, JohnO wrote:
On Friday, 22 July 2016 21:30:54 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:But rich believes.
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:43:09 +1200, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:
On 7/22/2016 11:07 AM, Newsman wrote:
Bernard Hickey..
Now , there's your problem, using a bias as a source
So who do yuo rely on, george?
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/mediawatch/audio/201807260/is-a-'post-truth'-era-upon-us
Nobody in their right mind would rely on "Red Radio".
By the bye I wouldn't take the word of any of the current commentators
who forget that their job is to report the news not create or be a part
of it.
Exactly. I want the facts reported, not some wet reporter's opinions.
"The leader of the Government is more worried about the short-term
fates of leveraged-up speculators and developers than the long-term
fate of Generation Rent.
"Despite years of saying the only way to improve housing affordability
is to increase supply, his position is any increase in supply that
hurts the investors who have bought in the past couple of years is out
of the question." (Bernard Hickey)
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 20:13:15 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Monday, 25 July 2016 13:15:28 UTC+12, george wrote:
On 7/25/2016 10:35 AM, JohnO wrote:
On Friday, 22 July 2016 21:30:54 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:But rich believes.
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:43:09 +1200, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote: >> >>
On 7/22/2016 11:07 AM, Newsman wrote:
Bernard Hickey..
Now , there's your problem, using a bias as a source
So who do yuo rely on, george?
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/mediawatch/audio/201807260/is-a-'post-truth'-era-upon-us
Nobody in their right mind would rely on "Red Radio".
By the bye I wouldn't take the word of any of the current commentators
who forget that their job is to report the news not create or be a part
of it.
Exactly. I want the facts reported, not some wet reporter's opinions.
Do you think Bernard Hickey is a wet reporter, JohnO?
From earlier in the thread:
"The leader of the Government is more worried about the short-term
fates of leveraged-up speculators and developers than the long-term
fate of Generation Rent.
"Despite years of saying the only way to improve housing affordability
is to increase supply, his position is any increase in supply that
hurts the investors who have bought in the past couple of years is out
of the question." (Bernard Hickey)
Which part of his "opinion" do you disagree with?
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/bernard-hickey/news/article.cfm?a_id=625&objectid=11671668
On Monday, 25 July 2016 16:33:31 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:sold his 4 bdrm Epsom home for $1.05m.
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 20:13:15 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Monday, 25 July 2016 13:15:28 UTC+12, george wrote:
On 7/25/2016 10:35 AM, JohnO wrote:
On Friday, 22 July 2016 21:30:54 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:But rich believes.
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:43:09 +1200, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote: >>>>>>
On 7/22/2016 11:07 AM, Newsman wrote:
Bernard Hickey..
Now , there's your problem, using a bias as a source
So who do yuo rely on, george?
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/mediawatch/audio/201807260/is-a-'post-truth'-era-upon-us
Nobody in their right mind would rely on "Red Radio".
By the bye I wouldn't take the word of any of the current commentators >>>> who forget that their job is to report the news not create or be a part >>>> of it.
Exactly. I want the facts reported, not some wet reporter's opinions.
Do you think Bernard Hickey is a wet reporter, JohnO?
No. Bernard Hickey is a catastrophically failed finance commentator.
He's the guy who announced in 2012 he's selling and moving to Wellington. He
What a genius - he's missed out on a tax free gain of at least $600k in thesubsequent 4 years!
From earlier in the thread:
"The leader of the Government is more worried about the short-term
fates of leveraged-up speculators and developers than the long-term
fate of Generation Rent.
"Despite years of saying the only way to improve housing affordability
is to increase supply, his position is any increase in supply that
hurts the investors who have bought in the past couple of years is out
of the question." (Bernard Hickey)
Which part of his "opinion" do you disagree with?
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/bernard-hickey/news/article.cfm?a_id=625&objectid=11671668
http://www.roymorgan.com/findings/6902-roy-morgan-new-zealand-voting-intention-july-2016-201607211639
On Monday, 25 July 2016 16:33:31 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:sold his 4 bdrm Epsom home for $1.05m.
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 20:13:15 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Monday, 25 July 2016 13:15:28 UTC+12, george wrote:
On 7/25/2016 10:35 AM, JohnO wrote:
On Friday, 22 July 2016 21:30:54 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:But rich believes.
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:43:09 +1200, george152 <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote: >>>>>>
On 7/22/2016 11:07 AM, Newsman wrote:
Bernard Hickey..
Now , there's your problem, using a bias as a source
So who do yuo rely on, george?
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/mediawatch/audio/201807260/is-a-'post-truth'-era-upon-us
Nobody in their right mind would rely on "Red Radio".
By the bye I wouldn't take the word of any of the current commentators >>>> who forget that their job is to report the news not create or be a part >>>> of it.
Exactly. I want the facts reported, not some wet reporter's opinions.
Do you think Bernard Hickey is a wet reporter, JohnO?
No. Bernard Hickey is a catastrophically failed finance commentator.
He's the guy who announced in 2012 he's selling and moving to Wellington. He
What a genius - he's missed out on a tax free gain of at least $600k in thesubsequent 4 years!
From earlier in the thread:
"The leader of the Government is more worried about the short-term
fates of leveraged-up speculators and developers than the long-term
fate of Generation Rent.
"Despite years of saying the only way to improve housing affordability
is to increase supply, his position is any increase in supply that
hurts the investors who have bought in the past couple of years is out
of the question." (Bernard Hickey)
Which part of his "opinion" do you disagree with?
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/bernard-hickey/news/article.cfm?a_id=625&objectid=11671668
| Sysop: | sneaky |
|---|---|
| Location: | Ashburton,NZ |
| Users: | 2 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 101:13:11 |
| Calls: | 2,124 |
| Files: | 11,149 |
| D/L today: |
15 files (10,759K bytes) |
| Messages: | 950,738 |