1. Forum
  2. Usenet NZ Messa
  3. NZ.GENERAL

  • The Bias of Lefty Media

    From Rich80105@3:770/3 to All on Friday, July 08, 2016 08:04:03
    One for JohnO:
    http://www.nbr.co.nz/opinion/flying-sheep-endanger-mccully

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From JohnO@3:770/3 to All on Thursday, July 07, 2016 14:14:57
    On Friday, 8 July 2016 08:03:28 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    One for JohnO:
    http://www.nbr.co.nz/opinion/flying-sheep-endanger-mccully

    NBR isn't lefty media you dumb twat. Nor is it mainstream media.

    If you want lefty media, look at "Red Radio" RNZ who paid public money to borderline criminal Nicky Hager for their Panama Papers flop:

    https://www.scribd.com/document/317659155/Radio-Nz-OIA#from_embed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Rich80105@3:770/3 to All on Friday, July 08, 2016 13:49:36
    On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 18:44:47 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Friday, 8 July 2016 13:38:56 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 14:14:57 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Friday, 8 July 2016 08:03:28 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    One for JohnO:
    http://www.nbr.co.nz/opinion/flying-sheep-endanger-mccully

    NBR isn't lefty media you dumb twat. Nor is it mainstream media.

    That may be your opinion, but of course yu have no evidence to support
    that opinion.

    It is my opinion and it is also the bleedin' obvious.

    1) NBR is very pro business and free enterprise - hardly "leftiie media" is it?
    2) NBR is paid content, behind a paywall. Hardly "mainstream media" then, is it?

    Is Matthew Hooten "left"or

    *Obviously* not.

    "biassed against National" in
    your opinion, JohnO?

    *Obviously not*.

    You do ask stupid questions, Dickbot.

    Do you agree with that particular article then?
    Should McCully be sacked?


    If you want lefty media, look at "Red Radio" RNZ who paid public money to borderline criminal Nicky Hager for their Panama Papers flop:

    https://www.scribd.com/document/317659155/Radio-Nz-OIA#from_embed

    I don't know why you describe Hager as "borderline criminal"- did you
    get that opinion from your friend Cameron Slater? Your cite gives

    He makes money from stolen materials. That's either borderline or fully criminal.

    No more illegal than GCSB - if you have any evidenc of illegality I
    hope you inform the proper authorities.


    perfectly understandable correspondence about legitimate journalism -
    did yu not realise that the Panama Papers were legitimate news, but
    required careful assessment to ensure that the information was
    responsibly handled? Doubtless that correspondence is publicly
    available becuase a) the parties have nothing to hide, and b) they can
    legitimately be proud to have been selected as trustworthy
    journalists.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Rich80105@3:770/3 to All on Friday, July 08, 2016 13:39:32
    On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 14:14:57 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Friday, 8 July 2016 08:03:28 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    One for JohnO:
    http://www.nbr.co.nz/opinion/flying-sheep-endanger-mccully

    NBR isn't lefty media you dumb twat. Nor is it mainstream media.

    That may be your opinion, but of course yu have no evidence to support
    that opinion. Is Matthew Hooten "left"or "biassed against National" in
    your opinion, JohnO?

    If you want lefty media, look at "Red Radio" RNZ who paid public money to borderline criminal Nicky Hager for their Panama Papers flop:

    https://www.scribd.com/document/317659155/Radio-Nz-OIA#from_embed

    I don't know why you describe Hager as "borderline criminal"- did you
    get that opinion from your friend Cameron Slater? Your cite gives
    perfectly understandable correspondence about legitimate journalism -
    did yu not realise that the Panama Papers were legitimate news, but
    required careful assessment to ensure that the information was
    responsibly handled? Doubtless that correspondence is publicly
    available becuase a) the parties have nothing to hide, abd b) they can legitimately be proud to have been selected as trustworthy
    journalists.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From JohnO@3:770/3 to All on Thursday, July 07, 2016 18:44:47
    On Friday, 8 July 2016 13:38:56 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 14:14:57 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Friday, 8 July 2016 08:03:28 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    One for JohnO:
    http://www.nbr.co.nz/opinion/flying-sheep-endanger-mccully

    NBR isn't lefty media you dumb twat. Nor is it mainstream media.

    That may be your opinion, but of course yu have no evidence to support
    that opinion.

    It is my opinion and it is also the bleedin' obvious.

    1) NBR is very pro business and free enterprise - hardly "leftiie media" is it? 2) NBR is paid content, behind a paywall. Hardly "mainstream media" then, is it?

    Is Matthew Hooten "left"or

    *Obviously* not.

    "biassed against National" in
    your opinion, JohnO?

    *Obviously not*.

    You do ask stupid questions, Dickbot.


    If you want lefty media, look at "Red Radio" RNZ who paid public money to
    borderline criminal Nicky Hager for their Panama Papers flop:

    https://www.scribd.com/document/317659155/Radio-Nz-OIA#from_embed

    I don't know why you describe Hager as "borderline criminal"- did you
    get that opinion from your friend Cameron Slater? Your cite gives

    He makes money from stolen materials. That's either borderline or fully criminal.

    perfectly understandable correspondence about legitimate journalism -
    did yu not realise that the Panama Papers were legitimate news, but
    required careful assessment to ensure that the information was
    responsibly handled? Doubtless that correspondence is publicly
    available becuase a) the parties have nothing to hide, abd b) they can legitimately be proud to have been selected as trustworthy
    journalists.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From JohnO@3:770/3 to All on Thursday, July 07, 2016 20:32:40
    On Friday, 8 July 2016 13:48:58 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 18:44:47 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Friday, 8 July 2016 13:38:56 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 14:14:57 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Friday, 8 July 2016 08:03:28 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    One for JohnO:
    http://www.nbr.co.nz/opinion/flying-sheep-endanger-mccully

    NBR isn't lefty media you dumb twat. Nor is it mainstream media.

    That may be your opinion, but of course yu have no evidence to support
    that opinion.

    It is my opinion and it is also the bleedin' obvious.

    1) NBR is very pro business and free enterprise - hardly "leftiie media" is
    it?
    2) NBR is paid content, behind a paywall. Hardly "mainstream media" then, is
    it?

    Is Matthew Hooten "left"or

    *Obviously* not.

    "biassed against National" in
    your opinion, JohnO?

    *Obviously not*.

    You do ask stupid questions, Dickbot.

    Do you agree with that particular article then?

    Some of it. But you're just diverting again, probably to hide your embarrassment in the current thread.

    Should McCully be sacked?

    Probably not - I don't know enough detail behind that case.



    If you want lefty media, look at "Red Radio" RNZ who paid public money to
    borderline criminal Nicky Hager for their Panama Papers flop:

    https://www.scribd.com/document/317659155/Radio-Nz-OIA#from_embed

    I don't know why you describe Hager as "borderline criminal"- did you
    get that opinion from your friend Cameron Slater? Your cite gives

    He makes money from stolen materials. That's either borderline or fully
    criminal.

    No more illegal than GCSB

    Stupid comment. The GCSB gets legal warrants to obtain interceptions and makes no financial gain from them. Nothing at all like Hager making money out of *illegally* obtained private emails and the like. Why do you persist in making a dick of yourself?

    - if you have any evidenc of illegality I
    hope you inform the proper authorities.


    perfectly understandable correspondence about legitimate journalism -
    did yu not realise that the Panama Papers were legitimate news, but
    required careful assessment to ensure that the information was
    responsibly handled? Doubtless that correspondence is publicly
    available becuase a) the parties have nothing to hide, and b) they can
    legitimately be proud to have been selected as trustworthy
    journalists.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Pooh@3:770/3 to All on Friday, July 08, 2016 16:33:00
    On 8/07/2016 1:39 p.m., Rich80105 wrote:
    On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 14:14:57 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Friday, 8 July 2016 08:03:28 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    One for JohnO:
    http://www.nbr.co.nz/opinion/flying-sheep-endanger-mccully

    NBR isn't lefty media you dumb twat. Nor is it mainstream media.

    That may be your opinion, but of course yu have no evidence to support
    that opinion. Is Matthew Hooten "left"or "biassed against National" in
    your opinion, JohnO?


    It's the opinion of a lot of people with far superiour comprehension
    skills than you have Rich. Funny how any rag or blog that attacks Key or National seems to become irrefutable evidence of National wrong doing.
    Unless of course it's Farrar or Whale attacking the government for cock
    ups. Which happens on a much more regular basis than your supposedly
    non-lefty thestranded, polity, norightturn or Red Flag.


    If you want lefty media, look at "Red Radio" RNZ who paid public money to borderline criminal Nicky Hager for their Panama Papers flop:

    https://www.scribd.com/document/317659155/Radio-Nz-OIA#from_embed

    I don't know why you describe Hager as "borderline criminal"- did you
    get that opinion from your friend Cameron Slater? Your cite gives
    perfectly understandable correspondence about legitimate journalism -
    did yu not realise that the Panama Papers were legitimate news, but
    required careful assessment to ensure that the information was
    responsibly handled? Doubtless that correspondence is publicly
    available becuase a) the parties have nothing to hide, abd b) they can legitimately be proud to have been selected as trustworthy
    journalists.


    The stupid and biased activist used stolen e-mails Rich. Or are you just pushing the belief within the left that they're above the law and don't
    need to follow it? The Panama Papers were a political stunt dreamed up
    no doubt by the criminal activist Hager to hopefully embarrass National
    but instead left the flung shit all over Hager, the msm, Labour and the
    Green party. Can't you remember back that far Rich?

    Pooh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)