XPost: alt.christnet.calvinist, alt.christnet.christianlife, alt.christnet.evangelical
XPost: alt.christnet.theology
From:
dolfboek@hotmail.com
CATACLYSM (HOLOCAUST):
I have within my modest library an incomplete set of ARAMAIC TARGUMS and KITTEL’s THEOLOGICAL DICTIONARY OF THE NEW TESTAMENT which had some
infusion of nazi idealism as to subsequently be re-edited.
QUOTE: “The ability of New Testament scholars to repeat major works of reference knows no bounds. Nowhere is this more regrettable than in the
case of the earlier volumes of the Theologisches Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament (TWNT), later translated into English as the Theological
Dictionary of the New Testament (TDNT).
These volumes were produced in Germany when anti-semitism was at its
height in the run-up to the Holocaust. Scholars nonetheless continue to
repeat their contents without proper critical assessment.
This main point has been made before. In one article on the general
problems of the use of Jewish sources in New Testament research, the
Jewish scholar Geza Vermes noted the unduly high regard in which the
TDNT is held among New Testament scholars. He also pointed out the
anti-semitic life-stance of its main editor, Gerhard KITTEL, whose
tractate Die Judenfrage was published in 1933, the same year as the
first volume of TWNT which defined NATURE-GENESIS (G1078) upon pages
682-685 WITH AN EMPHASIS GIVEN TO PYTHAGOREAN ORPHIC ELEMENTS WHICH
ENTERED INTO THE PHILOSOPHY OF PLATO, AND FROM PLATO INTO MOST LATER
PHILOSOPHY THAT WAS IN ANY DEGREE RELIGIOUS, and the same year as KITTEL
joined the Nazi party...
"For in many things we offend all. If any man offend not in word, the
same is a perfect man, and able also to bridle the whole body. Behold,
we put bits in the horses’ mouths, that they may obey us; and we turn
about their whole body. Behold also the ships, which though they be so
great, and are driven of fierce winds, yet are they turned about with a
very small helm, whithersoever the governor listeth.
Even so the tongue is a little member, and boasteth great things.
Behold, how great a matter a little fire kindleth! And the tongue is a
fire, a world of iniquity: so is the tongue among our members, that it
defileth the whole body, and setteth on fire the *COURSE*-TROCHOS (G5164
- NOT DEFINED BUT DERIVED FROM G5143 IN VIII:226-233) OF
*NATURE*-GENESIS (G1078 IN I:682-685) and it is set on fire of hell."
[James 3:2-6 (KJV)]
Thus if you put together the PYTHAGOREAN ideas:
1) the PRE-PLATONIC advocate PHILOLAUS (470-385 BCE) as a principle
proponent of the PYTHAGOREAN doctrine considered the Natural Year to be
364.5 days which is identical to the Chinese trinomial conception of
number that by its circularity conveys an #41 - ONTIC: #205 + #164 =
#369 organisation as premise of #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY for #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
<
http://www.grapple369.com/images/EarthSeasons.png>
2) PYTHAGORAS invented the binomial number methodology #36 - ELEMENTS so
that by new sciences diminished the need for “CONJURED PIETY BY READING
THE ENTRAILS OF SLAUGHTERED CHICKENS”
<
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wEb3BoJ4hU>
3) SOME WOULD SUGGEST this is identical to the NUMBER COMMENTARY METHOD
OF DIVINATION WITHIN THE MYSTERY where similarly there were #36 YARROW
STALKS {ie. the process of bifurcation resulted in 1, 2 or 3} within the
T’AI HSUAN set.
Thus the questions are whether any such PhD established upon the
binomial methodology is little better than chicken shit void of any
capacity to make any sound judgment upon ALL.
That such mystical proclivities need to be differentiated from
neo-fascism as also a *PROMOTION* *OF* *NEOPLATONIC* *HELLENISM*
“Concerning the gods of Pythagoras, son of Mnesarchus, I learned this
when I was initiated at Libeth in Thrace, Aglaophemus administering the
rites to me. Orpheus, son of Calliope, instructed by his mother in the
Pangaean mountain, said that number is an eternal substance, the most
provident principle of the universe: heaven, and earth, and middle
nature; likewise the root of divine beings, and of gods and daemons.”
Hence (says Iamblichus) it is manifest that Pythagoras received from the traditions of Orpheus the doctrine that numbers hold the determinate
essence of the gods. *BY* *THESE* *NUMBERS* *HE* *FRAMED* *A*
*WONDERFUL* *SYSTEM* *OF* *DIVINATION* *AND* *SERVICE* *OF* *THE*
*GODS*. This had the closest affinity to numbers {ie.
IT DEPLOYS ONLY 8 ELEMENT PAIRINGS:
MIND: #1 + #2 = #3
SCIENCE: #3 + #4 = #7
OPINION: #5 + #6 = #11
SENSE: #7 + #8 = #15
#3 + #7 + #11 + #15 = #36 AS ITS SCHEMA OF DIVINATION
AND A #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL AS EQUIVALENTLY 64 ELEMENTS OF A
BINOMIAL METHODOLOGY}, as may be evinced from hence (for it is requisite
to give an instance for confirmation of what we say).
The student of Pythagoras, Abaris, performed those kinds of sacrifices
to which he was accustomed, and *DILIGENTLY* *PRACTICED* *DIVINATION*
*AFTER* *THE* *WAYS* *OF* *THE* *BARBARIANS* *BY* *VICTIMS*
(*PRINCIPALLY* *OF* *COCKS*, *WHOSE* *ENTRAILS* *THEY* *CONCEIVED* *TO*
*BE* *MOST* *EXACT* *FOR* *INSPECTION*). Pythagoras, not willing to take
him away from his study of truth; yet, in order to direct him by a safer
way, without blood and slaughter (moreover esteeming the cock sacred to
the Sun), taught Abaris to find out all truth by the science of
arithmetic. Thus says Iamblichus, who writes elsewhere that Pythagoras,
instead of the art of divining by sacrifices, taught that kind of
prediction which is by numbers, conceiving that to be more sacred and
divine, and more agreeable to the celestial nature of the gods.
This hint some have taken to impose upon the world, under the name of Pythagoras, an Onomantic kind of arithmetic—assigning particular numbers
to the letters of the alphabet, to the *PLANETS*, to the days of the
week, and to the signs of the Zodiac. They thereby resolve questions
concerning nativities, victory, life or death, journeys, prosperity or adversity. *SUCH* *A* *SYSTEM* *IS* *SET* *DOWN* *BY* *FLUDD*, {
SOVEREIGN ONTIC NECESSITY (6.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123
- JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176 - KANT'S IDEA B176: *THE* *TRANSCENDENTAL*
*DOCTRINE* *OF* *THE POWER* *OF* *JUDGMENT* *OR* *ANALYTIC* *OF*
*PRINCIPLES*); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 24 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
Ego: 61 (#348),
@9: Sup: 66 (#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE*); Ego: 42 (#390 -
*SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*),
Male: #266; Feme: #390
}
HUMAN BEING (3.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123
- JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 68 (#244); Ego: 24 (#311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF
3 APRIL 33 AD),
@9: Sup: 67 (#311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL
33 AD); Ego: 80 (#391),
Male: #311; Feme: #391
} // [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS (*YES*) / NOLUNTĀTIS (*NO*)]
*VOLUNTY* (noun):
[ETYMOLOGY]: coined by Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
from Latin voluntās f (genitive voluntātis).
- (obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love,
creation, etc.
- *YANG*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陽/阳 (yáng), originally in reference to the sunny side of areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *GEMATRIA*} such
as mountains and dwellings.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
philosophies associated with bright, hot, masculine, etc. elements of
the natural world.
*NOLUNTY* (noun):
[ETYMOLOGY]: coined by Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
from Latin nōluntās f (genitive nōluntātis).
- (obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold, destruction, etc.
- *YIN*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陰/阴 (yīn), originally used
in reference to shaded areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *UMBRA* *AS* *GEMATRIA* *MORPHOLOGICAL* *SUBSTITUTION*}, as of a mountain or home.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
philosophies associated with dark, cool, female, etc. elements of the
natural world.
- Robert Fludd was born at Milgate House, Bearsted and was the son of
Sir Thomas Fludd, a high-ranking governmental official (Queen Elizabeth
I's treasurer for war in Europe), and Member of Parliament.
KANT’s implementation of SYMBOLICAL associator to the NOUMENON as having
a #41 - *ONTIC* necessity with CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING which incontrovertibly conform to a COGNITION of a trinomial as HOMOIOS THEORY
OF NUMBER that has a definitive impetus from 1783 and thusly we can by
such APRIORITY CASCADE against subsequent HISTORY and is capable of
BEREAVING SOVEREIGN STATES of IDENTITY which as MARRIAGE / SOVEREIGN
DYNAMIC has been built on castles of SAND which deploys a microcosm
binomial redefinition (HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER) of those APRIORITY
trinomial CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING.
} who adds that Apollonius has delivered another *WAY* *OF* *DIVINATION* *ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *PYTHAGOREAN* *DOCTRINE*: {
#288 - META SCHEMA ACQUIESCENCE {*REGENERATION*}:
@1 - @728 - PASSOVER {#ONE: FRIDAY OF 3 APRIL 33 AD},
@5 - PENTECOST {#FIVE: + 7x7+1 AS 50 DAYS ON 23 MAY WHICH *CONFLICTS*
*WITH* *ARCHBISHOP* *GEORGE* *PELL'S* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* AT
SAINT PATRICK'S CATHOLIC CATHEDRAL, MELBOURNE UPON PENTECOST SUNDAY /
BEERSHEBA MEMORIAL DAY OF 31 MAY 1998 AND PENTECOST {#382 - *THE*
*SCIENCE* *INTO* *A* *PERMANENT* *STATE*; #383; #384; #385; #386} OF
SUNDAY 11 JUNE 2000 (SOLAR ECLIPSE YEAR FOLLOWING: 21 JUNE Prototype:
*HOMOIOS* {#382 / #385} / HETEROS {#384 / #386} / TORAH {#378 / #383}):
#337 as [#30, #50, #7, #200, #10, #40] = naziyr (H5139): {UMBRA: #7 as
#267 % #41 = #21} 1) consecrated or devoted one, Nazarite; 1a)
*CONSECRATED* *ONE*; 1b) *DEVOTEE*, Nazarite; 1c) untrimmed (vine);
#474 as [#100, #4, #10, #300, #10, #50] = qaddiysh (Aramaic) (H6922):
{UMBRA: #6 as #414 % #41 = #4} 1) *HOLY*, *SEPARATE*; 2) (TWOT)
*ANGELS*, *SAINTS*;
AS BEING COGENT #364 - *QUESTIONS* *OF* #430 - *LAW* AGAINST #364 x 4 +
#371 = #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL BLASPHEMY OF THE SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL BY EXPLANTATION AND SUBSTANTIATION MADE OF A LEGITIMATE IDENTITY
TO JEWISH / CHRISTIAN APOSTLES AS A SECTARIAN ASSOCIATION OF NAZARENES /
#509 - YAHAD DEAD SEA SCROLL COMMUNITY [Acts 24:1-6; Acts 28:17-22]
WHICH WAS INITIALLY CONVEYED WITHIN OUR INSTRUCTIONS TO LEGAL COUNSEL
DATED 18 NOVEMBER 2018
#65 - *SOLDIER* {MARS},
#175 - MARRIAGE {VENUS} THEURGIC COSMOGONIC SYNCRETISM) OF NEOPLATONISM COMMONLY USED BY PYTHAGOREAN NUMBER DERIVED GOVERNANCE (ROMAN
CATHOLICISM / ISLAM etc)
} affirming that future things may be prognosticated by virtue of a
wheel invented by Pythagoras. Hereby is treated of life and death, of fugitives, of litigious business, of victories, of the sex of children
unborn, and infinite others of the like kind. But concerning the
exposition of the wheel, and the true position of numbers, therein the
ancient authors have written very inconstantly. So that the truth of its composition cannot be comprehended otherwise than by conjecture. What
ancient authors he means I know not. The citation of Apollonius I doubt
to be no less an assumption than the wheel itself, which Trithemius and
others acknowledge to be an invention of later times.” [NINTH SECTION OF
the 1687 EDITION OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY: Pythagoras: His Life and Teaching, a Compendium of Classical Sources, Part IX, Chapter 15, Page 529]
The purpose of this article published in 1999 was accordingly to use the
pages of a major international journal for the study of the New
Testament to draw attention to the anti-Jewish assumptions of some
material in TWNT. This material is still being repeated because of the regrettably high regard in which this work of reference is held, and
because of the widespread and unfortunate habit of repeating the words
of dead professors, regardless of truth or falsehood. I draw explicit
attention to the Nazi allegiance of the author of the article on
Ioudaios and other words for Jewish people...”
<
https://brill.com/previewpdf/journals/nt/41/3/article-p280_7.xml>
The Grumble Project is an Informal Research Project for the further
development of the Grapple369 Prototype which is a theoretical and
conceptual metaphysical Noumenon, comprising a cubic spacial overlay
associated with DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek: trochos)
OF NATURE (Greek: genesis) [James 3:6] otherwise broadly known as the
DAO TE CHING, 7 x #369 Magic Squares and the HETEROSQUARE SPIROGYRA
array which is then keyed to Biblical Hebrew/Greek Lexicon as CATEGORIES
OF UNDERSTANDING.
"TRINOMIAL {Y-M-T-A} METASTASISED MATHEMATICAL THEORETICAL NOUMENON AS
IMPETUS TO EMPIRE GOVERNANCE BY A DISCREET {% #81} AUTONOMOUS PARADIGM
THROUGH THE EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS:
#205 - PRINCIPLE OF THE PERSISTENCE OF SUBSTANCE ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY
AS #369 - DISCRIMINATING NORM CAPABLE OF UTILITY FOR COGNITION, SAPIENCE
AND EMANATION BY PROVISION OF ONTIC {% #41} NECESSITY DEFINITIONS IN AGGREGATIONS OF MORAL PROSCRIPTIONS IMPOSED ON THE PERENNIALIST BINOMIAL {A-U-M} STASIS BASIS AS A METHODOLOGY."
That we thereby completely circumscribed the KING JAMES BIBLE {
circa 1604 / 1611 CE which back in the day when there was clearly
defined a language / sovereign dynamic and prior to the SECOND VATICAN
COUNCIL was a means to assert SOVEREIGNTY
} by providing lexicon expansion functionality for the biblical
narrative against an ONTIC (ie. Chinese DAOist HAN Dynasty (206 BCE to
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
