[continued from previous message]

Now, if you want to present some proper, peer-reviewed science, I'm
always ready to read it and discuss. Post bullshit and you'll treated as
you deserve."

DOLF ON 22 MARCH 2017: "LAWRENCE KRAUSS AND BIG THINKS SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
AS APOLOGISTS FOR FASCISM

<http://www.grapple369.com?date:2017.3.22>

Big Think is once again promulgating the narcissistic fascist Lawrence
Krauss as Theoretical Physicist and Science Educator's lie about the
earth being 6,000 years old issue.

I QUOTE: "It is not your responsibility to make people with outlandish
beliefs with no basis in scientific fact feel better. Lawrence Krauss
with a valuable life lesson.

<https://www.facebook.com/BigThinkdotcom/posts/10154464144628527>

It amazes me that people have pre-existing notions that defy the
evidence of reality. But that they hold onto them so dearly. And one of
them is the notion of creationism, or, in fact, Senator Marco Rubio,
who’s presumably a reasonably intelligent man and maybe even educated,
was asked what’s the age of the Earth, and ultimately, either because he actually believed it or he was trying to appeal to some constituency,
had to argue that it’s a big mystery, that somehow we should teach kids
both ideas, that the Earth is 6,000 years old and that it’s 4.55 billion years old, which is what it is.

If you think about that, somehow saying that, well, anything goes, we
shouldn't offend religious beliefs by requiring kids to know - to
understand reality; that’s child abuse. And if you think about it,
teaching kids - or allowing the notion that the earth is 6,000 years old
to be promulgated in schools is like teaching kids that the distance
across the United States is 17 feet. That’s how big an error it is.

Now you might say, look, a lot of people believe that, so don’t we owe
it to them to allow their views to be present in school? Well, as I’ve
often said, the purpose of education is not to validate ignorance but to overcome it. Fifty percent of the people in the United States, when we
probe them each year with the National Science Foundation, think that
the sun goes around the Earth, not that the Earth goes around the sun.
When we asked the question - we provide the question: The Earth goes
around the sun and takes a year to do it; true or false? Almost every
year, 50 percent of the people get that wrong.

Now, does that mean in schools we should allow the anti-Galilean and
Copernican idea that the sun goes around the Earth to be taught?
Absolutely not. If, in fact, the very fact that people don’t know that,
and the very fact that enough people are willing to somehow believe that
Earth is 6,000 years old, means we have to do a better job of teaching
physics and biology, not a worse job.

The last thing we want to do is water down the teaching of biology
because some people don’t recognize that evolution happened. Evolution
is the basis of modern biology and, in fact, if a lot of people don’t
believe it, it only means we have to do a better job teaching it. So
once again, I repeat, the purpose of education is not to validate
ignorance, but to overcome it. And to overcome a situation where a
United States Senator can speak such manifest nonsense with impunity is
vitally important to the healthy future of our society.

Technology and biotechnology will be the basis of our economic future.
And if we allow nonsense to be promulgated in the schools, we do a
disservice to our students, a disservice to our children, and we’re guaranteeing that they will fall behind in a competitive world that
depends upon a skilled workforce able to understand and manipulate
technology and science.

<http://bigthink.com/videos/lawrence-krauss-stop-validating-ignorance>

I have refuted this previously and also your repetitious fascist lie.

But let me just say that like the Chinese #81 x 4.5 day = 364.5 natural
year calendar had a Grand Inception on the midnight new moon as solstice
of 21 December 103 BCE.

Upon which hangs your Scientific Opinion of the Pythagorean TETRAD
METHODOLOGY as (binary) HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER, being the Western
orientation of the year and our millennium, century and decade calendar
to this day.

DOES HE DENY THIS HISTORICAL FACT?

The alternate HOMOIOS (ternary as TETRAGRAMMATON) THEORY OF NUMBER is a
22/7 = RATIONAL PI perspective as being ipso facto: 7 x 24 x 13 (2184
days / 364 day solar year = 6 or 2184 / 354 day lunar year + 2 x 30 day
lunar intercalated months) x 49 = 6J or 294 x 364 days or 365.2423 x 293 tropical years which was always superior to the Julian calendar.

SO WHAT IS YOUR BOAST?

This view of the cosmogony suggests that the Big Bang occurred as
instantiation at some point in temporal relativity of the Equinox of
Wednesday 20 March / New Moon on Thursday 21 March and from whence our
notion of infinity is derived.

That the perspective of 6,000 years is not as Lawrence Krauss suggests
by a straw man argument as being concerned with the age of earth /
universe but of temporal relativity within infinity and by which we
ANCHOR and apply our MIND understanding of the meta-descriptor
prototypes as the (Gk.) COURSE-trouchos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]
for ALL TIME as ETERNITY.

"Verily, verily, I say unto thee, We speak that we do know, and testify
that we have seen; and ye receive not our witness.

If I have told you earthly things, and ye believe not, how shall ye
believe, if I tell you of heavenly things?

And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from
heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven.

And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the
Son of man be lifted up:

That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life.

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that
whosoever believeth in him should not perish [as you will perish
Lawrence Krauss], but have *EVERLASTING* *LIFE*.

For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that
the world through him might be saved.

He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.

And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men
loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.

For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the
light, lest his deeds should be reproved.

But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God." [John 3:11-21 (KJV)]

That the 6,000 year reprise of this understanding of (Gk.)
NATURE-genesis occurred on the Equinox of Wednesday 20 March 1996 / New
Moon of 21 March 1996.

For a visualisation of this see the following HEBREW CALENDAR link:

<http://www.hebcal.com/hebcal/?v=1&maj=on&min=on&nx=on&i=off&year=1996&month=x&yt=G&lg=s&c=off&geo=geoname&zip=&city=&geonameid=&b=18&m=50&.s=Create+Calendar>

FRED ESPENAK'S NASA 50 YEAR ECLIPSE COMPUTATIONS SHOW REPEATED SOLAR
ECLIPSE GEO-LOCATIONS AS HAVING A SUFFICIENTLY CLOSE APPROXIMATION
SUGGESTING THIS BASE-7 (7^2 = JUBILEES, 7^1 = WEEKS, 7^0 = DAYS) VIEW OF
THE COSMOGONY THEORY IS CORRECT.

In that, according to FRED ESPENAK'S computations, the Solar Eclipse of
4 December 2002 will have a geo-location reprise within 28 years.

In order to disprove this theory of 6,000 year relativity within
infinity as occurred on the equinox of Wednesday 20 March 1996 / New
Moon on Thursday 21 March 1996 as I have shown, you must demonstrate
that this cosmological conjunction did not occur 6,000 years prior as
like the Chinese present day calendar had a Grand Inception upon the
midnight of 21 December 103 BCE, in being a consciousness of that
cosmological reality which you have not only continually ignored the
asserted facts but denied the reality as having no plausibility.

WHAT SORT OF IMPARTIAL SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY IS THAT?

Proving that fact as being otherwise is the only way you win the court
case against the defamatory characterisation which I unashamedly and
without remorse make against the person, scientific integrity and
reputation of the fraudulent liar which is Lawrence Krauss and Big Think
as indistinguishably fascist.

Aren't you in the least bit ashamed that the ignorance of me knows the
MIND who established this UNIVERSE, laid the foundations of the earth
and set the COURSE-trouchos OF NATURE-genesis?

You GODLESS frauds."

ORGANIZATION: Mixmin (German anonymous remailer)
MESSAGE-ID: (ompti7$2ht$1@news.mixmin.net)

SEASNAKE (HYDROPH.II@N.AE) @ 0208 HOURS ON 14 AUGUST 2017: "Silence,
Auztard!

Not our fault"

WILE E. COYOTE (NUKE_THEM_FROM_ORBIT@SULACO.COM) @ 0056 HOURS ON 13
AUGUST 2017: "Hey asshat, serious question. What do you do for a living?"

ORGANIZATION: Mixmin (German anonymous remailer)
MESSAGE-ID: (ompti7$2ht$1@news.mixmin.net)

SEASNAKE (HYDROPH.II@N.AE) @ 0232 HOURS ON 14 AUGUST 2017: "He's a pommy bastid.

They're ALL on the dole."

INITIAL TARGET PIKE TARGET NEWSGROUPS:
- talk.politics.guns

TREVOR WILSON (TREVOR@SPAMBLOCKRAGEAUDIO.COM.AU) @ 1553 HOURS ON 13
AUGUST 2017: "FOLLOW THE MONEY:

**Perhaps. However, if it has not received peer-review, it is of dubious scientific value [just like my inconsequential www-page of 25 July 2007
since the advent of eBay]."

SCOUT (ME4GUNS@CENTURYLINK.REMOVEME.THIS2.NET) @ 1831 HOURS ON 13 AUGUST
2017: "No, it's scientific value depends on the validity of what is said.

After all, the lack of 'peer-review' didn't alter the truth of what
Galileo Galilei wrote, nor is what he wrote of 'dubious scientific value'.

If you wish to claim what they wrote is wrong, then by all means do so. However, to simply dismiss it out of hand because it's not what you want
to hear........ sort of makes you like the Church who refused to accept anything that didn't conform to things as they decided they must exist."

MRSP ROYAL ORDER OF THE DOW #4 (JQUEBECOIS@GMAIL.COM) @ 1634 HOURS ON 13
AUGUST 2017: "BINLKY'S GENDER CONFUSION:

LOL! Offered the job by the delusional loon that thinks he/she has some
kind of authority to bestow that title?"

"And they began to accuse him, saying, We found this [fellow] perverting
the nation, and forbidding to give tribute to Caesar, saying that he
himself is Christ a King." [Luke 23:2 (KJV)]

TREVOR WILSON (TREVOR@SPAMBLOCKRAGEAUDIO.COM.AU) @ 1945 HOURS ON 13
AUGUST 2017: "**Incorrect. We always need cross-checking of any radical scientific claims.

**That's a bit of a stretch, given Galileo predates the peer-review
process by several centuries.

**Well, if you want to discount the peer-review process, you can throw
away your GPS, because it operates on one of Einstein's, yet to be
proven, theories. The atomic bomb relies on another of Einstein's then, unproven, theories. Nonetheless, all of Einstein's work was subject to
the peer-review process.

Me? I'll stick with the peer-review process. You can rely on your
religious beliefs and nonsense. We'll see who's correct.

**Religious nutters are just that. Their gobbledegook may be ignored, as
it is of no consequence."

SCOUT (ME4GUNS@CENTURYLINK.REMOVEME.THIS2.NET) @ 2015 HOURS ON 13 AUGUST
2017: "I see, so as long as the scientific claims conform....then we
don't need to cross check.

As long as you agree with the church that the Earth is the #CENTRE of everything, then that's how it is.

Meanwhile, I would note that serious cross checking isn't done by
publications. Often it's not even done by them after publication. Indeed radical scientific claims are often dismissed from publication because
they are radical, not because the publication can show anything wrong
with the science done.

I could write a scientific paper, and everything in it be 100% accurate,
true, and supported by my evidence......but you would dismiss it out of
hand because it's not been published in a magazine.

Sorry, if you want to show they are wrong, then you need to do so. You
can't simply say they are wrong because they haven't been published. On
the flip side, just because it's been published doesn't make it true......

Otherwise this would be proof that the Force is real.

<http://www.bizpacreview.com/2017/07/24/scientists-get-peer-reviewed-journals-publish-nonsense-based-star-wars-prove-point-517468>

Indeed it's been an ongoing scandal about how easily, or cheaply, you
can get a 'peer reviewed journal' to publish almost anything. Cough up a
few hundred or few thousand dollars and they will apparently publish
nearly anything. If it's a slow month, they have to come up with
something to fill the publication so they pick whatever seems valid with
little or no consideration for it's scientific merits.

I would simply note that if you want to be a conformist...then you stick
to the publications, if you want to know the facts then you look at everything."

THE DOCTOR (DOCTOR@DOCTOR.NL2K.AB.CA) @ 2232 HOURS ON 13 AUGUST 2017: "MR.SmartyPants lies chronically"

YOUTUBE: "Doctor Who - Journey's End - Dalek Caan's prophecy"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3GMqzJnasE>


On 24 Jan 2018, at 10:45 am, Richard C. Silk <dicksilk@gmail.com> wrote:

LOL! Dolf, I'm just a normal person trying to help a fellow human
being, per the Golden Rule of Jesus Christ. But if you *choose* to
refuse my help, that's fine too. Just PLEASE stop spamming
alt.religion. Thank you!

PS: I'm a republican, pro-Trump American. Fascists and Nazis are
actually LEFT wing organizations masquerading as "alt.right" in an
attempt to besmirch the good name of the Republican party. If you don't believe me, do your own research. Nazis were socialists. Bernie
Sanders is a socialist (and a democrat.) Democrats are all "one world
order" bullshit socialists. With God's guidance, such will NEVER
happen, unless it's the USA who leads by example to guide all other nations.

PPS: The Antifa movement is actually a pro-fascist movement hiding as
an anti-fascist movement. They're simply pathetic.

Note: you did post one thing that caught my attention:

"...TO EXERCISE, DURING THE PLEASURE OF THE GOVERNOR GENERAL SUCH
POWERS, AND FUNCTIONS OF THE SAID GOVERNOR GENERAL AS HE THINKS FIT TO
ASSIGN TO SUCH DEPUTY OR DEPUTIES, SUBJECT TO ANY LIMITATIONS AND
DIRECTIONS AS AFORESAID, TO APPOINT ANY PERSON OR PERSONS, JOINTLY OR
SEVERALLY ... SHALL NOT AFFECT THE EXERCISE BY THE GOVERNOR GENERAL
HIMSELF OF ANY POWER OR FUNCTION."

To that point:

Tyranny results whenever one passes law that applies ONLY to "others" or "self."

Not sure if that was what you were addressing, but that's my opinion.

Have a nice day :-)
Silk.


On 24/1/18 10:48 am, Richard Silk wrote:

Richard Silk <dicksilk@gmail.com> it is not logical to be claiming a
dignity to your own person as an anonymous contrived GOLEM / GNOME
construct (eg: *TROLL*) {

#356 as #10, #90, #200, #50, #6 = yetser (H3336): {#0 as #300} 1) form, framing, purpose, framework; 1a) form; 1a1) pottery; 1a2) graven image;
1a3) man (as formed from the dust); 1b) purpose, imagination, device (intellectual framework)

} as a tranny cocaine whore doing a bl@mpkin would have more dignity and accountability whilst engaging in knowingly false past slander about
alleging a lack of coherence with others.

The matter will be going to court having a universal jurisdiction at the
time of my choosing and I will not rest until you are punished for such intentional *DEHUMANISING* *CONDUCT* *AS* *CRIMES* *MADE* *AGAINST* *HUMANITY* *AND* *SEDITION* *CONSTITUTING* *A* *WAR* *CRIME*.

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)