• The Word was made man, in order that man might be made divine.

    From fool for Christ@1:229/2 to All on Tuesday, January 09, 2018 14:20:12
    XPost: alt.christnet.calvinist, alt.christnet.christianlife, alt.christnet.evangelical
    XPost: alt.christnet.theology, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy, alt.religion.christian.episcopal
    XPost: alt.religion.christianity, alt.religion.christian.presbyterian, alt.religion.christian.pentecostal
    XPost: alt.religion.christian.adventist, alt.messianic

    "The Word was made man, in order that man might be made divine. He
    displayed Himself through a body, that we might receive knowledge of the invisible Father. He endured insult at the hands of men, that we might
    inherit immortality. In Himself He suffered no injury, being impassable and immortal, and very Word of God. But in His impassability, He was guarding
    and saving the suffering man, for whose sake He endured this treatment."

    St. Athanasius, On the Incarnation of the Word.

    "But when the fullness of the time had come, God sent forth His Son, born
    of a woman, born under the law, to redeem those who were under the law,
    that we might receive the adoption as sons." Galatians 4:4-5

    Draw nigh unto God and He will draw nigh unto you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From none@none.com@1:229/2 to fool for Christ on Tuesday, January 09, 2018 12:49:09
    XPost: alt.christnet.calvinist, alt.christnet.christianlife, alt.christnet.evangelical
    XPost: alt.christnet.theology, alt.religion.christian.biblestudy, alt.religion.christian.episcopal
    XPost: alt.religion.christianity, alt.religion.christian.presbyterian, alt.religion.christian.pentecostal
    XPost: alt.religion.christian.adventist, alt.messianic

    On 09 Jan 2018 14:20:12 GMT, fool for Christ wrote:

    "The Word was made man, in order that man might be made divine. He
    displayed Himself through a body, that we might receive knowledge of the >invisible Father. He endured insult at the hands of men, that we might >inherit immortality. In Himself He suffered no injury, being impassable and >immortal, and very Word of God. But in His impassability, He was guarding
    and saving the suffering man, for whose sake He endured this treatment."

    St. Athanasius, On the Incarnation of the Word.

    Then why was his body distorted beyond all belief? Why did he suffer
    and shed his blood that was a whole part of who he was and is?

    Why does his eternal body have nail prints in it, and why is there a
    gaping hole in his side that you can put your hand into?

    He did indeed suffer injury, to take our injuries upon himself, both
    spiritual and physical. To deny that is to deny his work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From Richard Silk@1:229/2 to All on Tuesday, January 09, 2018 11:15:29
    From: dicksilk@gmail.com

    The omnipresence of God states that *everything* is Divine. For man to consider himself to be more divine than anything else represents the sin (error) of pride and/or vanity.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)
  • From Richard Silk@1:229/2 to no...@none.com on Wednesday, January 10, 2018 11:31:25
    From: dicksilk@gmail.com

    On Tuesday, January 9, 2018 at 2:49:09 PM UTC-6, no...@none.com wrote:
    <snip>
    Then why was his body distorted beyond all belief? Why did he suffer
    and shed his blood that was a whole part of who he was and is?

    Why does his eternal body have nail prints in it, and why is there a
    gaping hole in his side that you can put your hand into?

    Why do bananas have no bones?

    God and Adam were having a conversation in the Garden shortly before the Fall, and Adam was thanking God for the beautiful totality of Creation. God thanked Adam and asked, "Glad you like it! Do you have any questions?"

    Adam thought a moment, then asked: "Just one-- what's the purpose of it all?"

    God asked him back: "Does everything have to have a purpose?"

    "Yes, of course!"

    "Then I leave it to you to figure one out," and He left.

    He did indeed suffer injury, to take our injuries upon himself, both spiritual and physical. To deny that is to deny his work.

    There is zero point in denying His crucifixion, suffering, death, and resurrection.

    My comment on the omnipresence of God goes to your original comment, "Draw nigh
    unto God and He will draw nigh unto you" as it requires dualism and denies God's omnipresence. Eliminate the dualism, embrace omnipresence. I think you'll catch my drift.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)