XPost: misc.immigration.usa, sac.politics, alt.politics.democrats
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.society.liberalism
From: mella_kon8834@yahoo.com

White Male Terrorists Are an Issue We Should Discuss

Who gets named a terrorist, and why?


Since September 11, 2001, preventing terrorism in the United States has
become one of the main concerns of citizens, policymakers, and law
enforcement agencies. Leaders believe that battling "terror" isn't just done
by waging war on jihadists themselves, but also on their ideology. When an attack whose perpetrator is affiliated with Islam occurs on American soil,
the nation collectively recoils in horror at the audacious attack, mourns for those we've lost, and then subsequently doubles down on rooting out any semblance of pro-extremist thought in our society.
When the assailant is identified, intelligence agencies conduct a thorough investigation into the subject's known terror ties. These ties are provided
to outlets that, in real time, condemn the violent extremism that animated
the subject. When bad actors align themselves with extremist Islamic
ideology, information about those who propagate this dangerous dogma is
eagerly consumed because we deem it essential — not to just know what
happened, but everything and every person that may have influenced what happened. Yet when it comes to domestic terrorism carried out by white men, such thorough accounting lacks.
Last week, America found itself in a terrifying and simultaneously familiar place: mourning the loss of life after a mass shooting. On Sunday, April 30, Monique Clark, a 35-year-old mother of three daughters, was killed after a gunman opened fire at guests at a poolside party inside an apartment complex. In addition to Clark, six other people — mostly black and Latinx — were
injured in the shooting spree by a 49-year-old white male named Peter Selis.
In the wake of the attack, witnesses and victims attested that race was a prominent factor in the shooting. Yet San Diego Police Chief Shelley
Zimmerman said just one day after the shooting that there was "zero information" that race contributed to the attack. (Navy Lt. j.g. Lauren Chapman, one of the attendees of the party, said she felt "heartbreak" at the police's dismissal of this motive, which witnesses say was a major factor.)
The shooting received such little immediate coverage that people took to
social media to blast major networks and politicians for their lack of reporting, and terror context.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)