XPost: alt.support.schizophrenia, alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.philosophy.zen XPost: alt.philosophy, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy
From: rainbowguardian@web.de

The Flux and The Corrective

If everything is relative or in a flux, what is the corrective
(fluxcompensator ;-) ) of the all-and-all, what changes the almighty,
the all-and-all, the Tao, the evolution? Is it an outside force, though
the all-and-all encompasses even that, is it the abstract, the unknown,
the unfathomable unnameable, is it chaosmagic, though it should also be
part of the al-and-all, and does it change also itself and the source of all-and-all and maybe the inversion of being, etc.? Is it like nde’ers
said like god creating the universe in a violent outburst, that some
kind of unknown violent source from the almighty something abstract
mystical unfathomable unnamemable is the corrective, driving force of
the flux, like if we must rub against each other, or like water washing
the stones, to become beautiful like yooperlites?


--
https://cosmicpurple.blog/

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)

XPost: alt.support.schizophrenia, alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.philosophy.zen XPost: alt.philosophy, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy
From: thangolossus@gmail.com

On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 13:22:35 +0100, einsiedlerkrebs
<rainbowguardian@web.de> wrote:

The Flux and The Corrective

If everything is relative or in a flux, what is the corrective >(fluxcompensator ;-) ) of the all-and-all, what changes the almighty,
the all-and-all, the Tao, the evolution? Is it an outside force, though
the all-and-all encompasses even that, is it the abstract, the unknown,
the unfathomable unnameable, is it chaosmagic, though it should also be
part of the al-and-all, and does it change also itself and the source of >all-and-all and maybe the inversion of being, etc.? Is it like nde’ers
said like god creating the universe in a violent outburst, that some
kind of unknown violent source from the almighty something abstract
mystical unfathomable unnamemable is the corrective, driving force of
the flux, like if we must rub against each other, or like water washing
the stones, to become beautiful like yooperlites?

I thought you said above that you were off your meds? Best you get on
them again, but whether you're on them or not, you're still nucking
futs :)

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)

XPost: alt.support.schizophrenia, alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.philosophy.zen XPost: alt.philosophy, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy
From: rainbowguardian@web.de

Am 21.11.2018 um 03:42 schrieb thang ornerythinchus:

On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 13:22:35 +0100, einsiedlerkrebs
<rainbowguardian@web.de> wrote:

The Flux and The Corrective

If everything is relative or in a flux, what is the corrective
(fluxcompensator ;-) ) of the all-and-all, what changes the almighty,
the all-and-all, the Tao, the evolution? Is it an outside force, though
the all-and-all encompasses even that, is it the abstract, the unknown,
the unfathomable unnameable, is it chaosmagic, though it should also be
part of the al-and-all, and does it change also itself and the source of
all-and-all and maybe the inversion of being, etc.? Is it like nde’ers
said like god creating the universe in a violent outburst, that some
kind of unknown violent source from the almighty something abstract
mystical unfathomable unnamemable is the corrective, driving force of
the flux, like if we must rub against each other, or like water washing
the stones, to become beautiful like yooperlites?

I thought you said above that you were off your meds? Best you get on
them again, but whether you're on them or not, you're still nucking
futs :)

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Sorry to tell you but just because you're stupid and don't understand
what i'm talking about doesn't make me "nucking futs"!

--
https://cosmicpurple.blog/

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)

From: rainbowguardian@web.de

Am 23.11.2018 um 19:37 schrieb LowRider44M:

On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 8:22:37 AM UTC-4, einsiedlerkrebs wrote:

The Flux and The Corrective

If everything is relative or in a flux, what is the corrective
(fluxcompensator ;-) ) of the all-and-all, what changes the almighty,
the all-and-all, the Tao, the evolution? Is it an outside force, though
the all-and-all encompasses even that, is it the abstract, the unknown,
the unfathomable unnameable, is it chaosmagic, though it should also be
part of the al-and-all, and does it change also itself and the source of
all-and-all and maybe the inversion of being, etc.? Is it like nde’ers
said like god creating the universe in a violent outburst, that some
kind of unknown violent source from the almighty something abstract
mystical unfathomable unnamemable is the corrective, driving force of
the flux, like if we must rub against each other, or like water washing
the stones, to become beautiful like yooperlites?


--
https://cosmicpurple.blog/

Borrowing inward a realm of "Nodes" is found.
A sea of spherical instantantaneous computations.
In math it is Zero, science the Zero Point, religion The Almighty
and in mysticism, The Kingdom Within.

To access and inhabit a single node successfully is Eternal Totality.
The realm we live in has delayed cause and effect in Zero there is no delay. Zero Almighty looks like a circular room or ship when inside, without

gadgets.

Everything is managed by consciousness. What you enter with is the tool set.

Repeated journies to Zero lead to more complex systems of consciousness.
Hard core building successes are eventually visible as real world events.

Simulation Debate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgSZA3NPpBs
Original Hypothesis
https://www.simulation-argument.com/

There's a similar philosophical thought construct/experiment of the
brain in jar in a scientists lab him creating a virtual reality for that
brain and performing tests on me/us!

Jesus spoke of the five trees.
(19) Jesus said: Blessed is he who was before he came into being. If you

become disciples to me (and) listen to my words, these stones will minister to you. For you have five trees in Paradise which do not change, either in summer or in winter, and
their leaves do not fall. He who knows them shall not taste of death

[]

Thank you for that!

In order to escape this version of the cosmos you have to build a new one.
In between the most inward and outward new formulas can be built and tested. A copy of this version of the cosmos once recorded can be used as a source for harvesting information patterns and complex identity patterns if a

decision

is made to populate ones own version of the cosmos with "Others"

There are many versions of the cosmos inhabitated by a single escapee from other versions of the cosmos, beings who live alone and "cast" a self into other highly populated versions of the cosmos when a decision is made to do

so.

Zero-Almighty as the most inward & outward is the origin of all versions of the cosmos and facilitates all new versions of the cosmos, including mine. This version of the cosmos we are in is without long range transportation

that

would allow its residents to populate its version of the cosmos.

regarding long range transportation, i already seen silver energy disc spaceships and golden light spaceship, though unknown if from this
universe or another reality!

Meaning and context must be built brick by brick, layer by layer.
In my eigth year I made it to Zero Almighty and have been building ever

since.

The Bomb - New Young Pony Club :-) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g05AE0S4fMs

--
https://cosmicpurple.blog/

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)

From: intraphase@gmail.com

On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 8:22:37 AM UTC-4, einsiedlerkrebs wrote:

The Flux and The Corrective

If everything is relative or in a flux, what is the corrective (fluxcompensator ;-) ) of the all-and-all, what changes the almighty,
the all-and-all, the Tao, the evolution? Is it an outside force, though
the all-and-all encompasses even that, is it the abstract, the unknown,
the unfathomable unnameable, is it chaosmagic, though it should also be
part of the al-and-all, and does it change also itself and the source of all-and-all and maybe the inversion of being, etc.? Is it like nde’ers said like god creating the universe in a violent outburst, that some
kind of unknown violent source from the almighty something abstract
mystical unfathomable unnamemable is the corrective, driving force of
the flux, like if we must rub against each other, or like water washing
the stones, to become beautiful like yooperlites?

--
https://cosmicpurple.blog/

Borrowing inward a realm of "Nodes" is found.
A sea of spherical instantantaneous computations.
In math it is Zero, science the Zero Point, religion The Almighty
and in mysticism, The Kingdom Within.

To access and inhabit a single node successfully is Eternal Totality.
The realm we live in has delayed cause and effect in Zero there is no delay. Zero Almighty looks like a circular room or ship when inside, without gadgets. Everything is managed by consciousness. What you enter with is the tool set.

Repeated journies to Zero lead to more complex systems of consciousness.
Hard core building successes are eventually visible as real world events.

Simulation Debate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgSZA3NPpBs
Original Hypothesis
https://www.simulation-argument.com/

Jesus spoke of the five trees.
(19) Jesus said: Blessed is he who was before he came into being. If you become
disciples to me (and) listen to my words, these stones will minister to you. For you have five trees in Paradise which do not change, either in summer or in
winter, and their
leaves do not fall. He who knows them shall not taste of death

[]

In order to escape this version of the cosmos you have to build a new one.
In between the most inward and outward new formulas can be built and tested.
A copy of this version of the cosmos once recorded can be used as a source
for harvesting information patterns and complex identity patterns if a decision is made to populate ones own version of the cosmos with "Others"

There are many versions of the cosmos inhabitated by a single escapee from other versions of the cosmos, beings who live alone and "cast" a self into other highly populated versions of the cosmos when a decision is made to do so.

Zero-Almighty as the most inward & outward is the origin of all versions of the cosmos and facilitates all new versions of the cosmos, including mine.
This version of the cosmos we are in is without long range transportation that would allow its residents to populate its version of the cosmos.

Meaning and context must be built brick by brick, layer by layer.
In my eigth year I made it to Zero Almighty and have been building ever since.

The Bomb - New Young Pony Club :-) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g05AE0S4fMs

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)

From: intraphase@gmail.com

On Friday, November 23, 2018 at 2:11:50 PM UTC-5, einsiedlerkrebs wrote:

Am 23.11.2018 um 19:37 schrieb LowRider44M:

On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 8:22:37 AM UTC-4, einsiedlerkrebs wrote:

The Flux and The Corrective

If everything is relative or in a flux, what is the corrective
(fluxcompensator ;-) ) of the all-and-all, what changes the almighty,
the all-and-all, the Tao, the evolution? Is it an outside force, though
the all-and-all encompasses even that, is it the abstract, the unknown,
the unfathomable unnameable, is it chaosmagic, though it should also be
part of the al-and-all, and does it change also itself and the source of >> all-and-all and maybe the inversion of being, etc.? Is it like nde’ers >> said like god creating the universe in a violent outburst, that some
kind of unknown violent source from the almighty something abstract
mystical unfathomable unnamemable is the corrective, driving force of
the flux, like if we must rub against each other, or like water washing
the stones, to become beautiful like yooperlites?


--
https://cosmicpurple.blog/

Borrowing inward a realm of "Nodes" is found.
A sea of spherical instantantaneous computations.
In math it is Zero, science the Zero Point, religion The Almighty
and in mysticism, The Kingdom Within.

To access and inhabit a single node successfully is Eternal Totality.
The realm we live in has delayed cause and effect in Zero there is no

delay.

Zero Almighty looks like a circular room or ship when inside, without

gadgets.

Everything is managed by consciousness. What you enter with is the tool

set.

Repeated journies to Zero lead to more complex systems of consciousness. Hard core building successes are eventually visible as real world events.

Simulation Debate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgSZA3NPpBs
Original Hypothesis
https://www.simulation-argument.com/

There's a similar philosophical thought construct/experiment of the
brain in jar in a scientists lab him creating a virtual reality for that brain and performing tests on me/us!

Jesus spoke of the five trees.
(19) Jesus said: Blessed is he who was before he came into being. If you

become disciples to me (and) listen to my words, these stones will minister to you. For you have five trees in Paradise which do not change, either in summer or in winter, and
their leaves do not fall. He who knows them shall not taste of death

[]

Thank you for that!

In order to escape this version of the cosmos you have to build a new one. In between the most inward and outward new formulas can be built and

tested.

A copy of this version of the cosmos once recorded can be used as a source for harvesting information patterns and complex identity patterns if a

decision

is made to populate ones own version of the cosmos with "Others"

There are many versions of the cosmos inhabitated by a single escapee from other versions of the cosmos, beings who live alone and "cast" a self into other highly populated versions of the cosmos when a decision is made to do

so.

Zero-Almighty as the most inward & outward is the origin of all versions of the cosmos and facilitates all new versions of the cosmos, including mine. This version of the cosmos we are in is without long range transportation

that

would allow its residents to populate its version of the cosmos.

regarding long range transportation, i already seen silver energy disc spaceships and golden light spaceship, though unknown if from this
universe or another reality!

Meaning and context must be built brick by brick, layer by layer.
In my eigth year I made it to Zero Almighty and have been building ever

since.

The Bomb - New Young Pony Club :-) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g05AE0S4fMs

--
https://cosmicpurple.blog/

My best guess, you saw reassurances from your eternal totality.
This world is like the 23rd floor of a building with trillions of floors. Knowing other worlds exists makes walking through this one a little easier.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)

From: thangolossus@gmail.com

On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 20:11:47 +0100, einsiedlerkrebs
<rainbowguardian@web.de> wrote:

Am 23.11.2018 um 19:37 schrieb LowRider44M:

On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 8:22:37 AM UTC-4, einsiedlerkrebs wrote: >>> The Flux and The Corrective

If everything is relative or in a flux, what is the corrective
(fluxcompensator ;-) ) of the all-and-all, what changes the almighty,
the all-and-all, the Tao, the evolution? Is it an outside force, though
the all-and-all encompasses even that, is it the abstract, the unknown,
the unfathomable unnameable, is it chaosmagic, though it should also be
part of the al-and-all, and does it change also itself and the source of >>> all-and-all and maybe the inversion of being, etc.? Is it like nde’ers >>> said like god creating the universe in a violent outburst, that some
kind of unknown violent source from the almighty something abstract
mystical unfathomable unnamemable is the corrective, driving force of
the flux, like if we must rub against each other, or like water washing
the stones, to become beautiful like yooperlites?


--
https://cosmicpurple.blog/

Borrowing inward a realm of "Nodes" is found.
A sea of spherical instantantaneous computations.
In math it is Zero, science the Zero Point, religion The Almighty
and in mysticism, The Kingdom Within.

To access and inhabit a single node successfully is Eternal Totality.
The realm we live in has delayed cause and effect in Zero there is no delay. >> Zero Almighty looks like a circular room or ship when inside, without gadgets.
Everything is managed by consciousness. What you enter with is the tool set. >>
Repeated journies to Zero lead to more complex systems of consciousness.
Hard core building successes are eventually visible as real world events.

Simulation Debate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgSZA3NPpBs
Original Hypothesis
https://www.simulation-argument.com/

There's a similar philosophical thought construct/experiment of the
brain in jar in a scientists lab him creating a virtual reality for that >brain and performing tests on me/us!

Jesus spoke of the five trees.
(19) Jesus said: Blessed is he who was before he came into being. If you become disciples to me (and) listen to my words, these stones will minister to you. For you have five trees in Paradise which do not change, either in summer or in winter, and

their leaves do not fall. He who knows them shall not taste of death

[]

Thank you for that!

In order to escape this version of the cosmos you have to build a new one. >> In between the most inward and outward new formulas can be built and tested. >> A copy of this version of the cosmos once recorded can be used as a source >> for harvesting information patterns and complex identity patterns if a decision
is made to populate ones own version of the cosmos with "Others"

There are many versions of the cosmos inhabitated by a single escapee from >> other versions of the cosmos, beings who live alone and "cast" a self into >> other highly populated versions of the cosmos when a decision is made to do so.

Zero-Almighty as the most inward & outward is the origin of all versions of >> the cosmos and facilitates all new versions of the cosmos, including mine. >> This version of the cosmos we are in is without long range transportation that
would allow its residents to populate its version of the cosmos.

regarding long range transportation, i already seen silver energy disc >spaceships and golden light spaceship, though unknown if from this
universe or another reality!

Did you take a photo?

Meaning and context must be built brick by brick, layer by layer.
In my eigth year I made it to Zero Almighty and have been building ever since.

The Bomb - New Young Pony Club :-)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g05AE0S4fMs

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)

From: intraphase@gmail.com

Evidence based believing and evidence based non-believing is not the issue.

Theorizing and not restricting the imagination by preconceptual limitations,
is the issue, if and when new knowledge and spheres of action are to be defined.

Claiming complete knowledge of all things and concluding only life and death are real and for certain is a fallacious argument based on unprovable axioms.

There is more to the process than nihilistic exstinguishing of imagination. What if both life and death here are an illusion created by our perception,
and the sensory apparattus that produces it.

Thinking creates pain.
The possible degrees of freedom are infinite, followed by responsibilities. Only consciousness exists, without it there are only perceptual equations.

The mind is an information assemblage.
The brain is a 3-10 dimensional computational point.
The mind survives after the brain, the brain is but the shell of perception.

Old jokes

What is mind?
Never matter.
What is matter?
Never mind.

What happens when an infinite force (mind)
meets an unmovable object (matter)
They merge.

If mind survives, matter is transformed into mind.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)

From: thangolossus@gmail.com

On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 08:41:08 -0800 (PST), LowRider44M
<intraphase@gmail.com> wrote:

Evidence based believing and evidence based non-believing is not the issue.

What the fuck is "evidence based non-believing"? How can a non-belief
be based on proof? Proof = data = facts. If there is proof, then
there must be belief - if one posseses the faculty of logic, that is.
Which admittedly seems to be in short supply around here.

Theorizing and not restricting the imagination by preconceptual limitations, >is the issue, if and when new knowledge and spheres of action are to be defined.

So you introduce "unrestricted imagination" - does this include the
existence of tooth fairies as imagined by a child? Or the existence
of allah or jehovah or god or krishna or hecate or jupiter as imagined
by adults? Or the existence of an afterlife as imagined by the
hopeful desperados?

And what are "preconceptual limitations"? Did you mean "preconceived limitations"? And what is a "sphere of action"? Wouldn't the word
"action" be clearer, shorter and less likely to be misunderstood?

Why use the term "pneumonoultramicroscipicsilicovolcanoconiosis" when
the word "silicosis" will suffice?

Claiming complete knowledge of all things and concluding only life and death >are real and for certain is a fallacious argument based on unprovable axioms.

If you're alluding to my posts in this dying NG, I merely stated the
obvious - there is no proof of existence after cessation of life
functions. And there isn't. I never claimed "knowledge of all
things" even though my knowledge is probably well above average in
scope. I just ask for proof because anyone wandering through an old
cemetery can see first hand the proof of cessation of life and the
dissolution of the once living bodies into constituent molecules and
elements - but the reverse is, shall we say, a little harder to
demonstrate.

Safest best is to man up and take life as Nabokov said - the merest
chink of light between two eternities of darkness.

There is more to the process than nihilistic exstinguishing of imagination. >What if both life and death here are an illusion created by our perception, >and the sensory apparattus that produces it.

Again, no proof, not even rudimentary evidence to back up this wild hypothesizing. What if - we have alter egos formed of dark matter and
dark energy and this is just a 3D appurtenance of ultimate reality?
(just made that up, like you did the above).

No evidence. You would be laughed off stage anywhere outside of
lunatic fringe shows if you took that sort of view seriously.

Thinking creates pain.

Rubbish. Elucidate.

The possible degrees of freedom are infinite, followed by responsibilities.

Does not make sense to me. Elucidate.

Only consciousness exists, without it there are only perceptual equations.

Really? Even died in the wool quantum mechanics theorists don't
believe that reducto ad absurdum. I think Bishop Berkely's views are
not at all taken seriously nowadays - if the tree falls in the forest
and there is no one to hear it, it really *does* still make a noise.

You clearly believe (again without proof) that the tree doesn't make a
noise. Ridiculous.

The mind is an information assemblage.

Well everything is information - generally curtailed by the speed of
light and other physical laws. That includes the mind (assuming you
mean the human mind) as well.

The brain is a 3-10 dimensional computational point.

What? Elucidate. Try not to stray into gibberish. If necessary,
cite some scholarly references or even Wiki.

The mind survives after the brain, the brain is but the shell of perception.

No proof whatsoever. Again, you're waffling about afterlife or
entering the sea of consciousness or whatever. Wrong. Life is cheap
and especially so when there are 7 billioin highly developed brains on
this planet and hundreds of trillions of planets in this one galaxy
and trillions of galaxies out to the cosmic horizon (>90MLY diameter
centred on earth at present, but expanding) and probably countless
trillions or quadrillions of galaxies after the horizon, but we'll
never know. And, potentially, infinite flat universe and possibly,
one of an infinite number of infinite flat universes - but we'll never
know that, either.

Give me proof or STFU.

Old jokes

What is mind?
Never matter.
What is matter?
Never mind.

What happens when an infinite force (mind)
meets an unmovable object (matter)
They merge.

If mind survives, matter is transformed into mind.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)