• 191 travel was crusty etc

    From MICHAEL LOO@1:123/140 to RUTH HAFFLY on Thursday, April 04, 2019 08:56:08
    Choice between a rock and a hard place or the devil & the deep blue
    sea.
    If you want to put it that way, yes.
    Do you want a computer programmed to do a rigid, based only on the data
    input by a human (and prone to errors) or a human who can take into
    account variables not available to the machine?

    If we're still talking about assistive devices, most
    of the time I'd pick the machine on the theory that I'm
    not important enough to have my assistive technology
    hacked. A tested computer-guided device would be at
    least as trustworthy as a possibly froward canine
    trained by a possibly froward human. And it piddles
    and poops less frequently, because it doesn't eat much.

    So I've always hated the idea of glass cockpits and
    am thinking that airplane systems could be hacked to
    amazing effect. This 737 Max thing is kind of getting
    to me.
    Steve said something about it this morning, basically on the order of
    looking into alternatives, if needs be. We have the option, given enough

    It becomes a concern. And the other day there was a
    computer crash affecting all the major airlines and
    most of the major airports. I wouldn't be so concerned
    about a personal VR system, though.

    time, of driving & taking the camper but that wouldn't always be a
    workable choice. Couldn't have parked it for a week in Seattle when we
    went on the cruise. (G)

    Nah, Hap's driveway is already full.

    see does most of his measuring by the eyeball method.
    If it works for you, don't belittle your methodology.
    That was a joke.
    It's also half serious--whatever works best for you, go for it. Just don't try to make something that calls for small, precise
    measurements > unless you know how much your "pinch" really is.
    Mine wasn't.
    Mine probably would be. (G)

    Uncle Matty's Hot Dogs with Onions
    categories: Italian-American, sausafes, main
    servings: 8 to 10

    2 pk hot dogs
    5 lg onions
    4 garlic cloves
    3 c tomato sauce
    1 1/2 c water
    1 Tb dried parsley
    red pepper flakes (tt)
    oil to saute onions

    Cut onions in 1/2 and then slice into 1/2 rounds.
    Put about 2 turns of a pans worth of extra virgin
    olive oil and saute the onions until they start
    to get golden.

    Meanwhile, mince the garlic. Take the hot dogs
    and cut them into coins. Not too thin.

    When the onions start to get golden, add the red
    pepper flakes, parsley and garlic to the pan. When
    you start to smell the garlic add the tomato sauce
    and water;

    When the sauce thickens add the hot dogs and let
    cook for 20 to 30 min to arm through.

    We make sandwiches on Italian bread but you could
    easily serve this over rice or a short cut pasta.

    Cathy LaFay, justapinch.com

    Though I'm pretty apprehensive about what happens to
    the rest of the flying fleet if Boeing goes down.
    Maybe it'll be reincarnated as a maintenance provider.
    I'm not even going to think about the possible ramifications to the
    air > travel industry.
    It's kind of not so remote for me.
    I know, but for travel in the States or within Europe, you could switch
    to trains. Don't know if you would want to take a cruise over to Europe
    tho.

    Again, I'm not really into planning for really
    remote eventualities.

    be advertised as such, by the arcane rules.
    Close enough to fat free to be labeled as such.
    Yeah, and there are lots of foods that qualify for
    the labeling that really aren't. It shouldn't be
    this way.
    Do you think your wheel is squeaky enough to get the grease that
    will > change the whole food labelling industry?
    My wheel isn't very squeaky, never was.
    No, but combine it with enough other not very squeaky wheels and you get
    a loud enough one that gets the grease.

    That would involve squeaking loud enough to
    rally other squeakers!

    Can't win for losing.
    Can't win by losing, either.
    Unless it's unwanted pounds.
    Even so.
    Some of them have a tendency to find their way back on.

    Pounds come home to roost.

    The Catholics have even stricter criteria for
    the term, going back to the etymology, which
    is also why I'm disinclined to use it at all.
    I'm not familiar with it off the top of my head (forgotten 99.99% of my
    high school Latin) but might remember it if I heard it. My definition is basic enough that the point can be understood by most everybody.

    It's a question of what terminologies you're
    sensitive to. The word I hate most is nonreligious
    but irritating: "foodie."

    be thankful that the typical smuggler of
    weapons is merely clueless rather than
    malevolent.
    Most often it's a case of the contraband being in the luggage from a
    previous trip and not noticed when packing. I try to empty out the
    luggage completely before stowing it away to avoid unexpects surprises
    like that.

    Often it is, but that doesn't excuse the gal with
    a gun and ammo who made it to Japan undetected this
    January! She was apparently totally oblivious and
    quite chastened (turned herself into the cops after
    landing in Tokyo).

    I'd agree with you there. It's been a while since we flew in/out of
    Sky > Harbor--that was the one we'd use when we were in HI and our
    girls were > (both) in AZ. Hawaiian had an overnight flight from Honolulu to Sky
    Harbor--very convenient for us.
    And it seems likewise that this particular
    transgressor was not significantly dangerous.
    Probably in a hurry and didn't pay attention to the signs on the door or
    some other innocent mis step.

    It wasn't in the news later, so one has no idea.

    I'm very much a purist when it comes to
    blueberries. Cranberries, not so much,
    the sky's the limit.
    Other than craisins, I tend to ignore cranberries in all forms.

    They are sort of eh, average in nutrition, but
    if you want to acidify, they're very good. They
    can't really be substituted for in some recipes,
    cranberry-orange bread, cranberry sauce,and so on.
    --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
    * Origin: Fido Since 1991 | QWK by Web | BBS.FIDOSYSOP.ORG (1:123/140)
  • From Ruth Haffly@1:396/45.28 to MICHAEL LOO on Friday, April 05, 2019 21:20:27
    Hi Michael,

    Choice between a rock and a hard place or the devil & the
    deep blue > ML> sea.
    If you want to put it that way, yes.
    Do you want a computer programmed to do a rigid, based only on the
    data > input by a human (and prone to errors) or a human who can take
    into
    account variables not available to the machine?

    If we're still talking about assistive devices, most
    of the time I'd pick the machine on the theory that I'm
    not important enough to have my assistive technology
    hacked. A tested computer-guided device would be at
    least as trustworthy as a possibly froward canine
    trained by a possibly froward human. And it piddles
    and poops less frequently, because it doesn't eat much.

    I still think it would be a toss up in some aspects, others, one or the
    other would be a clear winner.


    So I've always hated the idea of glass cockpits and
    am thinking that airplane systems could be hacked to
    amazing effect. This 737 Max thing is kind of getting
    to me.
    Steve said something about it this morning, basically on the order
    of > looking into alternatives, if needs be. We have the option, given enough

    It becomes a concern. And the other day there was a
    computer crash affecting all the major airlines and
    most of the major airports. I wouldn't be so concerned
    about a personal VR system, though.

    It's beginning to get quite concerning.


    time, of driving & taking the camper but that wouldn't always be a workable choice. Couldn't have parked it for a week in Seattle when
    we > went on the cruise. (G)

    Nah, Hap's driveway is already full.

    We would have had to plan to be gone much longer than we were. We'd have probably stopped to visit our daughters either on the way out to Seattle
    or on the way back.

    it. Just > ML> > don't try to make something that calls for small, precise
    measurements > unless you know how much your "pinch" really is. Mine wasn't.
    Mine probably would be. (G)

    Uncle Matty's Hot Dogs with Onions
    categories: Italian-American, sausafes, main
    servings: 8 to 10

    2 pk hot dogs
    5 lg onions
    4 garlic cloves
    3 c tomato sauce
    1 1/2 c water
    1 Tb dried parsley
    **************

    I'd probably use Italian seasoning here, or add some oregano & maybe a
    bit of basil to the parsley.

    We make sandwiches on Italian bread but you could
    easily serve this over rice or a short cut pasta.

    Cathy LaFay, justapinch.com

    to the > ML> air > travel industry.
    It's kind of not so remote for me.
    I know, but for travel in the States or within Europe, you could
    switch > to trains. Don't know if you would want to take a cruise over
    to Europe > tho.

    Again, I'm not really into planning for really
    remote eventualities.

    Doubtful any of us would have to resort to private boats or whatever to
    get to Europe, Asia, etc.

    be advertised as such, by the arcane rules.
    Close enough to fat free to be labeled as such.
    Yeah, and there are lots of foods that qualify for
    the labeling that really aren't. It shouldn't be
    this way.
    Do you think your wheel is squeaky enough to get the grease
    that > ML> will > change the whole food labelling industry?
    My wheel isn't very squeaky, never was.
    No, but combine it with enough other not very squeaky wheels and you
    get > a loud enough one that gets the grease.

    That would involve squeaking loud enough to
    rally other squeakers!

    How loudly can you squeak?


    Can't win for losing.
    Can't win by losing, either.
    Unless it's unwanted pounds.
    Even so.
    Some of them have a tendency to find their way back on.

    Pounds come home to roost.

    Usually so.

    The Catholics have even stricter criteria for
    the term, going back to the etymology, which
    is also why I'm disinclined to use it at all.
    I'm not familiar with it off the top of my head (forgotten 99.99% of
    my > high school Latin) but might remember it if I heard it. My
    definition is > basic enough that the point can be understood by most everybody.

    It's a question of what terminologies you're
    sensitive to. The word I hate most is nonreligious
    but irritating: "foodie."

    That's a term I dislike also. There are others that certain food related personalities use that are equally off putting.

    Most often it's a case of the contraband being in the luggage from a previous trip and not noticed when packing. I try to empty out the luggage completely before stowing it away to avoid unexpects
    surprises > like that.

    Often it is, but that doesn't excuse the gal with
    a gun and ammo who made it to Japan undetected this
    January! She was apparently totally oblivious and
    quite chastened (turned herself into the cops after
    landing in Tokyo).

    I missed hearing about that one, doesn't matter at this point.


    I'd agree with you there. It's been a while since we flew
    in/out of > ML> Sky > Harbor--that was the one we'd use when we were
    in HI and our > ML> girls were > (both) in AZ. Hawaiian had an
    overnight flight from > ML> Honolulu to Sky
    Harbor--very convenient for us.
    And it seems likewise that this particular
    transgressor was not significantly dangerous.
    Probably in a hurry and didn't pay attention to the signs on the
    door or


    CONTINUED IN NEXT MESSAGE <<

    ---
    Catch you later,
    Ruth
    rchaffly{at}earthlink{dot}net FIDO 1:396/45.28


    ... Computers run on smoke. They stop when it leaks out.

    --- PPoint 3.01
    * Origin: Sew! That's My Point (1:396/45.28)
  • From Ruth Haffly@1:396/45.28 to MICHAEL LOO on Friday, April 05, 2019 21:33:51
    Hi Michael,

    CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS MESSAGE <<

    some other innocent mis step.

    It wasn't in the news later, so one has no idea.

    So probably not that big a problem.

    I'm very much a purist when it comes to
    blueberries. Cranberries, not so much,
    the sky's the limit.
    Other than craisins, I tend to ignore cranberries in all forms.

    They are sort of eh, average in nutrition, but
    if you want to acidify, they're very good. They
    can't really be substituted for in some recipes,
    cranberry-orange bread, cranberry sauce,and so on.

    Still not one of my favorite berries, especially teamed with orange.

    ---
    Catch you later,
    Ruth
    rchaffly{at}earthlink{dot}net FIDO 1:396/45.28


    ... Junk: stuff we throw away. Stuff: junk we keep.

    --- PPoint 3.01
    * Origin: Sew! That's My Point (1:396/45.28)